The Tomb Doesn’t Hold
Easter in a Time of Noise and Reaction
The Fifty Days of Easter have arrived in the middle of a season that feels unsettled. Instability has worked its way into everything. It shows up in the news, in the church, and in our own lives. Assumptions that used to hold steady do not feel as secure. The systems we trusted do not seem as reliable. Even the rhythms that once gave shape to our days feel interrupted.
Into that, we tribal squirrely humans, have built another layer of life online that promises clarity but often delivers something else. The pull is constant. Scroll a little further. Click one more headline. React quickly. Choose a side. Stay engaged. It feels like staying informed, but really it is a steady diet of outrage, certainty, and noise.
Easter does not arrive after all of that resolves. It does not wait for us to sort through what is true, what is exaggerated, and what is simply designed to keep us hooked. It comes right into the middle of it.
In the Easter Gospel according to Luke, the women go to the tomb early in the morning carrying spices. They are doing what love does when there is nothing left to do. They are not expecting resurrection. They are expecting to tend to a body. They are moving toward what they understand, toward what feels certain, even if that certainty is grief.
What they find instead unsettles everything. The stone has already been rolled away. The place they expected to be fixed and final has been altered. That alone should be enough to stop them in their tracks. It signals that something has happened, but it does not yet tell them what it means.
They enter the tomb, and it is empty. This is not a symbolic absence but a concrete and disorienting new thing. The one thing they thought they could rely on, the finality of death, no longer holds in the same way. The body is gone. The story they thought had ended has been opened again, but without explanation.
Then comes the question: “Why do you look for the living among the dead?”
Not a rebuke… an invitation to see differently.
They had gone to the tomb because that is where they last saw Jesus. That is where they knew him to be. And now they are being asked to let go of that assumption, to recognize that life cannot be contained in the place where death is supposed to have the final word.
That question reaches directly into the way we move through the world now, especially in the spaces we inhabit online.
We go looking for life in places that are designed to keep us stirred up rather than grounded. We return to feeds that amplify anger because anger keeps us engaged. We step into echo chambers that promise belonging as long as we keep repeating what is already being said. We start to believe that staying reactive is the same thing as being alive, that constant commentary is the same thing as meaning.
But rage is not life. Endless reaction is not resurrection.
There is a reason those spaces feel exhausting even when we cannot seem to pull away. They offer intensity without transformation. They give the appearance of movement while keeping everything in place. They circle around the same conflicts, the same fears, the same narratives, and call it engagement.
Easter interrupts that pattern.
The resurrection is not another piece of content to react to. It is not one more perspective to add to the stream. This is God acting in a way that breaks open what we thought was settled. Death does not hold in the way we assumed it did. The limits we placed around what is possible are no longer reliable.
That does not mean the women suddenly understand everything. They leave the tomb with fear and wonder mixed together. When they speak, they are not believed. Peter runs to see for himself and leaves still trying to make sense of it. The story does not resolve neatly or quickly.
What changes is not their ability to explain it. What changes is reality itself.
Death no longer has the last word.
That matters for us, especially in a world where so much energy is spent reacting to what feels broken. It matters when we are drawn into cycles of outrage that never seem to lead anywhere new. It matters when the loudest voices demand immediate response but offer no real path toward life.
The resurrection does not depend on our ability to keep up with all of that. It does not require us to win arguments or prove a point. It does not emerge from the noise.
It comes from God.
That means the instability we feel is not the same as absence. It means uncertainty is not evidence that God has stepped away. It means that even when the loudest spaces in our lives are filled with conflict, God is at work in quieter, deeper ways that are not driven by reaction.
God raises the dead. That is not content to consume. It is a reality to be drawn into.
The tomb does not hold. Not for Jesus, and not for the future God is bringing into being.
This presses into our habits and asks something of us. It asks whether we are willing to step back from the places that keep us circling around death and pay attention to where life is actually breaking through. It asks whether we can loosen our grip on the need to react to everything and instead be formed by something that is not driven by outrage.
The question remains in front of us: why do you look for the living among the dead?
It is a question about where we direct our attention. It is a question about what we trust to give us life. It is a question that cuts through the noise and asks us to consider whether the places that demand the most from us are actually giving anything back.
Easter does not hand us a new argument. It gives us a different center.
The stone has been rolled away. The tomb is empty. The story is open.
And in a world full of voices competing for our attention, the resurrection calls us to something steadier, something deeper, something that does not need to shout to be true.

